Waferpedia

Tokyo Electron

Clean Track Lithius i+

Provisional entry — research in progress

This page was generated automatically from cited public sources and hasn't completed the full research pass yet. Every specification shown carries its source; more detail is added as research completes.

Clean Track Lithius i+ — Inventory photo
Fig. 01Clean Track Lithius i+Inventory photo[1]

What it is

The Tokyo Electron Clean Track Lithius i+ is a coater and developer system used in semiconductor manufacturing for photolithography processing.[2]

The Clean Track Lithius i+ is designed for the 193 nm immersion lithography process.[1][2]

How it works

General reference — not yet source-verified

Coater and developer systems from the Tokyo Electron Clean Track family operate by spin-coating photoresist onto wafers, followed by soft-baking on hot plates to evaporate solvents and promote adhesion.

After wafer exposure in a lithography scanner, the system performs post-exposure bake and develops the latent image by applying developer solution, followed by rinsing and drying.

Where it fits in the process flow

General reference — not yet source-verified

The system receives wafers from prior process steps such as pre-cleaning or primer deposition and delivers developed wafers for subsequent pattern transfer steps like etching or ion implantation.

What do the numbers mean?

Gas & chemistry1

Equipment type
coater/developer semiconductor manufacturing system[2]
Accurate?

Configuration & options5

193nm Immersion[2]
Accurate?
Manufacturer
Tokyo Electron[2]
Accurate?
Model
Clean Track Lithius i+[2]
Accurate?
Asset number
74232[1]
Accurate?
Last confirm date
September 27, 2023[1]
Accurate?
Interested in this tool?
Need help with this tool?Embed spec card

What does it need to run?

Site utility requirements, footprint, and infrastructure needed to install and operate this tool. Sourced from public records.

  • Equipment typecoater/developer semiconductor manufacturing system[2]

Where are the manuals?

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Worked with this tool? Help preserve its knowledge →

Frequently asked questions

What type of equipment is the Clean Track Lithius i+?

The Clean Track Lithius i+ is a coater and developer semiconductor manufacturing system.[2]

What lithography process is the Clean Track Lithius i+ designed for?

The Clean Track Lithius i+ is designed for the 193 nm immersion lithography process.[1][2]

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the Clean Track Lithius i+ are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the Clean Track Lithius i+ are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • No publicly documented variants, configuration options, or revision breakpoints of the Clean Track Lithius i+ are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM product catalog or an engineer who ordered or specified the tool

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the Clean Track Lithius i+ are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the Clean Track Lithius i+ are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

  • The process node or technology generation of the Clean Track Lithius i+ is not on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM datasheet or a fab qualification report

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (2)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]Inventory photo
  2. [2]waferpedia.com — waferpedia.comwaferpedia.com
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Oct 9, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →